근접 스위치 센서가 공개되었습니다: 유형과 애플리케이션에 대한 심층 분석
엘리베이터가 언제 문을 열어야 하는지, 휴대폰을 귀에 대면 어떻게 화면이 꺼지는지 궁금한 적이 있나요? 이러한 스마트한 상호작용의 숨은 주역은 바로 근접 스위치 센서입니다. 이 작지만 강력한 장치는 물리적 접촉 없이도 물체의 유무를 감지하여 [...]에 없어서는 안 될 필수 요소입니다.


When you need to measure position or movement in automation, robotics, or industrial control, two names usually come up: encoder vs potentiometer.
While both serve a similar purpose—providing position feedback—their working principles, strengths, and ideal use cases are very different.
Let’s dig deeper into how these two popular sensors stack up so you can make a confident choice for your next project.
An encoder is a sensor that converts mechanical movement—whether rotation or linear travel—into digital signals.
It uses optical, magnetic, or capacitive technology to detect movement and outputs either pulses (incremental) or unique codes (absolute).
Encoders stand out for their high precision, reliability, and seamless integration with digital control systems.
You’ll find them in everything from industrial automation and robotics to CNC machines and advanced manufacturing setups.
Key advantages of encoders:
However, encoders do have a few considerations. Incremental encoders, for example, may require a homing procedure after power loss to re-establish position.
Some types can be sensitive to dust or oil contamination, especially optical models, but magnetic and capacitive designs are much more robust.


A potentiometer, or “pot,” is a much simpler device. It consists of a resistive track and a moving wiper.
As the wiper moves, it changes the resistance and produces an analog voltage that corresponds to position.
Potentiometers are widely used for basic position sensing in simple circuits, manual controls, and low-cost feedback systems.
Key advantages of potentiometers:
That said, potentiometers come with their own set of trade-offs. Because they rely on physical contact between the wiper and resistive track, they wear out over time.
They’re also more susceptible to dust, vibration, and electrical noise. If you need long-term reliability or high accuracy, these factors can become limiting.


| 기능 | 인코더 | Potentiometer |
|---|---|---|
| 출력 유형 | Digital pulses or codes | Analog voltage |
| Precision | High (especially optical types) | Moderate (limited by mechanical wear) |
| 내구성 | Long life (non-contact options) | Wears out over time (contact-based) |
| Cost | Higher | Very low |
| Integration | Ideal for digital systems | Simple for analog circuits |
| Environmental Suitability | Robust (magnetic/capacitive types) | Sensitive to dust, vibration, wear |
| Power-on Behavior | May require homing (incremental type) | Always knows position |
| Application Focus | Precision, automation, robotics | Basic, low-cost feedback |
| 유지 관리 | Minimal (non-contact types) | Needs periodic replacement |
| 신호 안정성 | Stable, immune to analog drift | Can drift due to temperature or wear |
Choosing between an encoder and a potentiometer depends on your project’s requirements, budget, and environment.
Both encoders and potentiometers have their place in the world of position sensing.
Encoders excel in precision, digital compatibility, and long-term durability, making them the smart choice for advanced automation and demanding environments.
Potentiometers, on the other hand, offer simplicity and affordability for straightforward feedback needs.
Consider your project’s requirements, environment, and future scalability before making your choice.
The right sensor will keep your system running smoothly and accurately for years to come.